Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The New Lance: Camping at Kachess Lake


We had taken our new camper out twice--once to Eastern Washington for three days of hiking and one day of biking on the Island Empire Bike Ride, and then once to South Whidbey State Park to camp with Adam.

It performed well both times.  It's like living in the lap of luxury. 

Want some heat?  Push a button.

Want to take the camper off of the pickup?  Push a button.

Want to keep things frozen all week?  Push a button.

Want a cool breeze through the camper?  Push a button.

Want to see how much battery you have left, how much water is in your freshwater tank, etc.?    Push a button. 

Want to watch TV?  Push a button.

Want to pay for it?  Turn on the US Bank website and push a button.

Nothing is gerry-rigged to work.  Everything is where it is supposed to be.  We even have a bathroom, although I doubt we'll ever use it.  We'd rather use bathrooms at campgrounds that other people have to clean, or the great out-of-doors which requires no cleaning.  But it works great for storage, which we need more of, and if we ever change our minds and want to use our camper in a different way then we now have that option. 

First are some photos from our first camping trip in it, to Eastern Washington.

Driving away:


We stayed at at Yakima Sportsman State Park.  The camping spots were kind of close to each other, and the ones close to bathrooms were basically in a row in a flat area.  Not very picturesque or private.  But it was fairly nice.

 



It allowed us to try out one of the important features of our new camper, which was to be able to easily remove it from the pickup, and then live in it as a free-standing unit. Like a tent. That was a major reason for getting a new camper--so we could drive the pickup sans camper to trail heads to hike.  We were fortunate that on our first road trip to the Southwest the previous year the trail heads for hikes were either close to where we camped (often right at the campgrounds) or a short bike ride away.  However, there are many spots where there is great hiking but where the trail heads might be 20 or so miles away from where we might camp, and on roads that are not too rough for an F-250 but are too rough for a camper.  We wanted to be able to leave the camper and then drive to these trail heads.

That's what we tried out, and it worked great.  We easily removed the camper from the pickup, and then each day drove about 10-15 miles to hikes. 

The first one was to the Yakima River Rim.  We drove the pickup about two miles up a road that was almost too rough for even it, then parked, and hiked up to the rim.  The hike involved a bit of a climb, but the sights of the Yakima River from the rim were stunning.

 


 






Our next hike was through Cowchise Canyon, which at one time had been a railroad line.  We took a spur up the side of the mountain from this trail and hiked on the mesa above.



This hike was memorable because it was our first exchange with a rattlesnake, which we heard warning us as we passed close by where it was hiding in a bush.  Never heard one live before--very loud.  We gave it a wide berth.




Our last day we hiked up Bear Canyon, a pleasant hike (except for the part where we got lost).  No bears, though. 

 




The next day we drove to the Tri-Cities for the Inland Empire Bike Ride.  Stayed at a nice RV park, got up early, and rode 80 miles as part of our training for the STP.  It was a nice ride.  Around mile 20 we climbed for several miles up a canyon.  Quite a climb, especially because we were not yet in prime (for us) bicycle shape.  But it was fun and rewarding and a needed break from hiking.

Of course, I had a flat.  





Our next trip in the new camper was to South Whidbey State Park with Adam.  We spent the afternoon at the beach.  Adam is such a blast.  He built sand castles, got buried in the sand, made s'mores, the whole bit.  It's the third time he's been to the park, and he seems to enjoy it, and us too.





One of the things we learned from our first two trial runs with the new Lance is that even though we had an extra battery installed in it, the camper draws much more electricity than did our old camper.  We found that we might only be able to stay out for about three days without getting them recharged--clearly not long enough for us.  Even when not in use, the propane/CO2 tester draws electricity, as does the clock.  When in use, the refrigerator uses electricity for its gauges and thermostat, even though the power is supplied by propane.   And we haven't even used the hot water heater or the furnace--both of which also use the batteries to run their gauges.   Then, of course, we have to watch our brand new camper TV in the evenings, which draws power.  The jacks for removing and installing the camper also run off of the 12 volt system.  Lots of ways power is taken from the camper batteries that they weren't in the old Chinook. 

Needing to recharge our batteries about every three days would mean 2-3 times more stays in RV resorts to charge batteries than we have planned.  This is a problem.  Not only do we generally not like RV resorts (exception:  29 Palms), but it is expensive to stay at them. We want to be able to stay away from almost all of them, if possible, and stay in National Parks until we run out of food and have to make a run to a town somewhere for more.   And we DON'T want a generator. 

Solution:  A solar panel.  The money we got from the sale the Chinook just about covered the cost of a large solar panel.

So our trip to Kachess lake was for fun and to test it out.

And it was also to celebrate our one-year wedding anniversary!

The campground at Kachess lake was OK, about in the middle as campgrounds go and on the low end of National Park campgrounds.  Once again the park hosts were gracious and helpful.  The only problem, actually sort of a major one for us, is that this campground doesn't set a limit on the number of people who can be at campsites.  We rented a spot for five days, what appeared to be a nice and relatively secluded one, only to learn two days later that a huge group of people rented the ones across from us and set up anywhere from 9-10 tents in each site!  Vehicles stuffed every which way. 

I felt like the Grinch:  "all the noise noise noise noise NOISE!"

We have learned a good rule:  If a campground has the word "Lake" in it, stay away.   We are not motor-boat, jet-ski, rubber-raft people.  We want to get away from civilization, not just pick it up and bring it with us. 





 Our hikes:

Our first hike was different from anything we have done before--mostly because I fell 6 times!  I had only fallen one other time on a hike, some three years ago, on some ice.  Vicky fell once.

I hurt my repaired foot on one of the falls, a particularly nasty one.  It was all black and blue the next few days.  That's the bad news.  The good news is that it was on our way back to the trail head.  We were on our way back because we had decided that the trail was not safe, so instead of pushing ourselves, we went back. 

The hike was to Twin Lakes, and from there up to the Pacific Crest Trail, and from there to a trail that led downward to Twin Lakes making a loop.  The first two parts of the trail were fine, if somewhat difficult.  The hike to Twin Lakes was about one mile, with mile elevation gain.  The small lake was beautiful (we didn't see the upper lake).

 



The hike from there to the Pacific Crest Trail was about two miles with severe elevation gain and on a rough trail.  At times it felt more like a scramble than a hike.  There had been several avalanches here in recent years, which meant lots of climbing over and under fallen trees:









It was hard work, even after all of our training for the  STP.  Our trail guide book indicated we had about a four mile walk on the Pacific Crest Trail until our trail to the descent, and this is where we ran into trouble--snow packs.  One occasionally runs into them when hiking, generally earlier in the year than the end of July, though.  We crossed three or four of them, when we could see the trail on the other side.  Vicky slipped on one, and I did on the same one, in the same place. 



 

 


After three or four of them we ran into one large one where we couldn't see the trail on the other side.  We decided at that point that we were too early in the year to do this trail safely, that we didn't have the appropriate equipment (Yaktraxs), and that we wanted enough time to safely descend the way we had come if need be.  So we turned back.  I slipped twice on the snowbanks returning.

On our way back along the PCT we ran into a guy who said "the trail is slippery back there."  We had already crossed that section, quite easily, an hour earlier, but when we went over it this time, I fell three times!  I think it was a combination of factors.  One is that my repaired foot is weak, especially in the toe area.  I have no feeling there, the nerves having been cut during the three surgeries.  So I don't have toes to help my balance.  Another factor is that I use cheap hiking boots--they are cheap because the better ones don't come in my size.

But a major factor is that the trail was simply bad.  Although it was dirt, it was like ice in spots.  My most wicked fall was because the trail just crumbled beneath me.  Vicky was behind me and watched the trail just fall away, and me with it.  I fell onto my trekking pole which wasn't strong enough to keep me upright.  I destroyed it as I fell backward onto a log.  I could do nothing to prevent the fall.

I was lucky, we were lucky, whatever.  But somehow, I don't know how, when I fell, I dug my right foot into the dirt to try to keep myself erect (even though I was falling to my left) and injured the repaired toes on my right foot. 

These things will happen, and I accept them as the risk of being in the outdoors.  However, even though the trail was a terrible one (remember the scramble up?  well it was also a sit-down and scoot-down-at-times trail down as well), we were fine after my bad fall.  We still had three useful trekking poles (note to anyone reading;  never do mountain hikes without trekking poles), and I was hiking slowly enough that I didn't fall hard or far.  We were both being cautious about the drop-off. 

The lessons here are obvious:  when something seems wrong, turn back.  I'm so glad we did.  We didn't get caught in a situation where we were unsafe, we trusted our instincts that the trail wasn't quite right, and, with the exception of YakTraxs, we had the right equipment.  We've also established a new rule, which we have dubbed the "safety rule."  Either of us can invoke the safety rule at any time and we turn back.  The other person doesn't have to agree.  The person invoking the safety rule gets two votes. 

Well, other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?

Well, other than the nasty falls, the hike was still beautiful and quite an exertion.  My thighs were very angry with me for about three days.  I know I know about cross-training, but still, after 205 miles of bike riding two weeks before, and almost 1800 biking miles this season, plus about 200 miles of hiking, I do one hike and can hardly walk because I'm sore?  I must be getting old or something.

We had planned on hiking all four days, but when my toe swelled up and got black and blue we realized we needed to change our plan.  Vicky found several nice walks in the area.  Walking involves using one's foot, as opposed to climbing which involves bending one's toes.  So for the next few days we took some nice 4-5 mile walks on trails.  Not what we had planned, but still fun, and we saw some interesting and beautiful sites, and got some good exercise.  My toes will heal and we will be back out doing real hiking within a few weeks.  By the time we left Kachess Lake, they were already feeling better.

One of the walks was through the Snoqualmie Tunnel--2+ miles long.   It's a cool old railroad tunnel that is now part of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail.  It was fun, and interesting, and we had it to ourselves for most of the time. 

We entered it from the east side, feeling a huge draft of cold air hitting us.  We used our headlamps since there was no lighting in the tunnel.  After walking about 100 yards or so we could see a small pinprick of light.  We found out that this was the other end of the tunnel, some 2 miles away.

 




The other side of the tunnel:

 



Beautiful view of the pass on this side of the tunnel:



The next day we went to Franklin Falls.

 


And on our last day walked several miles along the John Wayne trail outside of Easton. 




The solar panel perfumed much better than we had expected.  Every day, with about 4-5 hours of sunlight on it, the panel completely recharged our batteries. 

What this means is that we can do what we had hoped--dry camp (i.e., with no electrical or water hookups) for as long as we want.  This will especially be true in the Southwest where the sunlight will be more extreme and more consistent than in the Pacific Northwest, where at best one can get a few hours of sunlight because of the trees. 

Yes!!!!   No RV "Resorts" for this couple!

And since every time we avoid an RV resort we will save somewhere in the $30-40 range, we should pay off the cost of the solar panel in a couple of seasons. 

We had a wonderful anniversary celebration.  We took a 5-mile walk in the morning, came back to our campsite and ate pineapple salsa Vicky made the night before, and then had a delicious dinner consisting of meatloaf and mashed potatoes that Vicky made. 

Tomorrow we head back to Seattle for Ian's birthday party. 


Oh yes, on one of our excursions we came across the world's smallest mountain get-away home. 





Monday, July 30, 2012

Seattle to Portland 2012



My third STP.  Jules' second, Vicky's first.

It's becoming a fam-i-ly tradition!

It's been four days since the three of us rode in to Portland, through a city block of people lined up at a fence clapping and cheering. 205 miles in two days.

First Jules, then Vicky, then me.  Only Sean wasn't with us, but I hope he will be sometime in the future.

As meaningful as my first STP in 2009 in some ways and, like last year's, more meaningful in important ways. 

I still cannot believe that I, at age 64, can ride my bike 205 miles in two days. 

We worked so hard, all three of us.  Jules, younger and stronger, didn't need to work as hard and rode so much faster than Vicky and I could.  That's the way it should be, and it makes me happy.

Vicky and I fighting arthritis and back injuries, knee problems and seat problems all through our training.  Three weeks before the STP Vicky messed up her back so badly she couldn't even get off off of the couch.  We both thought the STP was a gonner then.  But she pulled through.  Both of us, at various times, having our knees hurting so much that each stroke was painful.  We loaded up with anti-inflammatories and hoped for the best.  It is what you do when you have had back injuries, foot and shoulder surgeries, and arthritis.  In other words, when you are in your 60s.

And then, with all of this, you just go out and will your way through it and have a wonderful time. Which we did.

Here we are taking off in the (very) early morning on the first day.  Nothing hurt yet.

 
Eating creamsickles at the half-way point.  I ate three.







 Leaving early the second morning.  115 miles down, only 90 to go!











Jules, then Vicky, then me at the finish line.  













Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Getting ready for the 2012 STP

We are good to go.  Since January, 2012, Vicky and I have logged just under 1600 bike miles in preparation.  A few hundred of those have been with my son, Jules.  Four days from when I write this, we three will make this very fun and rewarding 200 mile trek to Portland.

We did a number of short rides on our road trip, January through March. so we could gradually work our way up to doing 100 milers in June.  And that's what we have been doing. 

Those 100 milers are killers, at least the last 35 miles of them are.  Most of our rides have been on areas around the Burke-Gilman in Seattle or on Whidbey Island.  The ones on Whidbey Island are the bad ones--it is an island of hills.

Twice we have made the ride from our home in Langley to Deception Pass, 47.5 miles away.  Both times we felt great all the way there, and for about 10-15 miles back.  But, as I said, the final 30 miles can be really hard.  Hills.  Hills.  And more hills.

The total elevation gain of the 205 miles of the STP is just under 5000 (different people provide different estimates, as there is error with the altimeters everyone uses).  Our Whidbey Island rides get us that much elevation in half that.  That's a huge difference because what it means is that on Whidbey Island there is no rest.  No places where you can just glide along for several miles on flat roads.

Here is my son-in-law's elevation report from Day 1 and then Day 2 of last year's STP.  (by the way, I sure wish Sean was with us this year.  It was such a big deal for him to come out last year and was an experience that I, as a father, never thought I'd have:  to have both my son and my son-in-law ride the STP with me). 



The next two charts are elevation reports from our training rides this year on Whidbey Island. The first is the 94 mile ride to Deception Pass and the second is a 100 mile ride around the island we did as our final training ride this week.



As is obvious from these charts, the STP is a much easier ride than our training rides.  From the top chart it can be seen that the first 50 or so miles of the STP are actually flat.    Flat!  Then there is the Puyullup hill which rises about 400 feet.  It is reasonably steep, and so is known as "the hill" on the STP.

Then at the end of the first day there is a slow rise into Napavine.  But that's it for the first 115 miles.  On the second day there are 2-3 200 foot hills, but basically it is a day of rollers.  And, again, a lot of flat miles.

The two bottom charts, though, indicate that there almost no miles of flat roads on our Whidbey Island rides.  Instead it is up and down, up and down.

For riders like us, the terrain makes a big difference.  I don't have a lot in the way of leg muscles, never have.  All I can do is work with what I have on my 64-year-old body and try to get it into shape.  Hills require muscles, not aerobic conditioning, so after 65 miles of hills, my muscles are shot.

Vicky has ridden even less than I have, so she experiences the same thing, although in attenuated form.  Genetics has been kinder to her, as she and her family are all strong people.  She also has been a runner all of her life, so she has a good muscle/weight ratio in her body.  We both basically started riding seriously in our 60s (her just this calendar year), but she is clearly the stronger rider.

So, what do I do to keep up with her?

I know!  I'll buy a better bike!  Then I won't be that much slower than her.

So that's what I did.  My old Jamis was almost shot--it was a great bike for what I needed to start riding because it was cheap and had a steel frame which absorbs the road well and is good for people with bad joints (like me).  It got me out on a bike, and into cycling, and I will never sell it--I'd rather let it rust as yard art first because I owe it so much.  Since March of 2009, which is when I bought it,  I have ridden a bit over 7000 miles.  I wouldn't have done a fraction of that unless I had purchased this bike.

But my son, with encouragement from my daughter-in-law Jessica, and with full support of Vicky, encouraged me to think about a better bike, now that it is clear that I am serious about the sport.

So I bought the lowest end carbon-fiber Specialized Roubaix.  It is a drop handle bar bike, very comfortable, and quite light.  And I love it.

And I'm still slower than Vicky, just not by as much. 

Here we are at Deception Pass.



And even though there are a lot of stronger bike riders in this state, it takes nothing from our accomplishments in what we have done.  It is a big deal to be able to do this training, two people in their 60s, one of whom has had five operations to correct structural problems in the past three years, and the other who, because of a serious car accident, has a titanium disk in her back which the doctors predicted would mean she would never even run again.

And we have a blast.  And have accomplished something together that we'll always have--we have trained, hard, and often in extreme discomfort, together to accomplish something as a couple. 

And while the "serious" riders pooh pooh the STP as just a fun party-ride, we really don't care.  Riding 200 miles in two days is a meaningful feat for anybody, and for us in particular.  In six days, the three of us, me, my wife, and my son, will cross that finish line in Portland and have a memory together that nobody can ever take away from us.  I can't wait.